Monday, April 9, 2012

Examining The Employment Report

Conflicting Economic Indicators And A Harsh Jobs Report

Recently, a number of conflicting economic indicators have surfaced for the U.S. Most disappointing is of course the Employment Situation report released on Friday, a day when exchanges for equities were closed. Today, however, such markets fell by 1.00% to 1.14%. Similarly disappointing are national rail traffic volumes released last Thursday, and continue in a down trend.

Looking at the conflicting positive data, the Institute for Supply Management released its monthly, broadly based, PMI numbers for U.S. manufacturing last week. It showed continued growth. Supporting the manufacturing PMI are U.S. Census Bureau Factory Orders, also showing growth.

Employment Did Take A Crunch

Employment data is the most concerning at the moment. March jobs grew at an abysmal 120,000 versus February's gain of 240,000. Huge difference, even considering analysts were estimating 201,000 jobs. Disturbing loss on estimates, and month over month results.

Breaking down the Bureau of Labor Statistics' study, frankly expected suspects again reveal themselves. Construction jobs compressed by 10,600, comporting with existing home sales, existing home inventories that are now being managed by banks, and apparent weakness in demand for new retail space on the commercial side.

What also might be to come are considerable downward signals for commercial real estate. According to the employment report, between general merchandise stores and department stores, March employment declined by seasonally adjusted 53,300 jobs, the most notable decline in employment on the report.

For real organic loss of jobs is telecommunications. While the sector lost only 3,600 jobs in March 2012, since March of 2011, it has shred 45,200 jobs.

Retail's Crunch Not A Real Surprise 

Retail sales last reported on March 13 for February numbers. The next release is slated for April 16. For the last report, general merchandise saw sales declining in February by only -.1%, but still had a yearly increase of 2.9%. Department stores did better with a February advance of 1.5%, with a yearly gain of a weak .2%.

Reported previously on this space are potential explanations for retail's en masse loss of jobs. For so long, many retailers, whether grocery, general merchandise, or department stores, have been increasing price to sustain sales against reduced traffic. At the same time, they have not been controlling SG&A expenses. Sustainability of profit is challenged with such propositions. Major examples are SuperValue and J.C. Penny. With associated layoffs and restructuring.

Gas prices and the inevitable inelasticity of demand are revealed in two ways today. Firstly, gas station stores lead the retail sales report with a yearly increase of 10.3% and a February increase of 3.3%. Then we have the simple fact of gas price, and how it has helped gas selling retailers such as Costco (look at Sunoco's switch in business plans).

Growth In U.S. Economy Are Cars And Bank Lending, But Is It Sustainable

Still, due to the nature of gasoline/convenience store retail, customer service jobs don't increase congruent to increased sales as with general merchandise and department stores. Ergo, we see a net loss of retail jobs on the Employment Situation report of down 34,000 for February.

Despite such losses, again I have to mention a pattern of suspects. Where retail has faltered over time in its traditional concept, we have leads that do in fact ramify through this economy.

Cars and transportation equipment created a combined 24,600 jobs for March. Monthly gains lead to yearly job creation of 130,200. Job creation like this drives the index and overall tells of competition for consumer money.

Consumer Credit advances show that in the U.S. banks are lending money. But on shorter term loans backed by vehicle collateral. But what did I hear about car prices reaching a recent high?

Is this market getting ahead of itself and lending on over priced collateral. Wouldn't be the first time.

No comments:

Post a Comment